Thought for the Day - 30/07/98
As the Labour Party Conference draws
to a close, more than one commentator has likened the speeches from
the platform to a religious revival rally. All the talk of
“community”, an “us not me” society, “idealism” and
“values”.
Now, the western world is
traditionally terrified by the Islamic ideal of no distinction
between religion and politics, but as the secular machinery of
government and society tries to deal with the most crucial questions
of all our lives, the language of politics inevitably sounds more
and more like the language of preachers.
In fact, the language could have been
lifted wholesale from the Islamic vision of the world, an
understanding of a greater global community overarching the
individual tastes and preferences of local tribes. A vision which
accepts the human urge to acquire wealth and power, but sets it in a
context of the wider needs of society as a whole, with the stress on
what you give, not what you get, and with the health of an
individual not seen as something unrelated to the health of a
society.
That Islamic vision includes
education, a religious duty in Islam, and welfare - Muhammad said
“He’s not a believer who eats his fill while his neighbour
remains hungry by his side” - plus all the other current interests
of Governments, like sport, law and order, and the environment.
But it’s often been suggested that
my belief in that Islamic vision somehow compromises my “Britishness”.
And I fear that New Europe, for all its multicultural ideals, is
defining itself less in terms of “being” anything than simply in
terms of “not being” muslim? Would we have been quite so passive
during the years of ethnic cleansing in Bosnia and Kosovo, had it
been muslims butchering Christians on the borders of the Community,
not the other way around?
In the western world, where secular
democracy is usually seen as an unquestionable goal, it’s
considered OK to subsume religious values under the umbrella of
politics, with the ultimate sin being to suggest that politics be
subservient to religion. Religion as a personal belief system, OK -
but never suggest that it could be relevant to the way that we run
our society.
|