Thought for the Day - 18/02/03
It seems that Edinburgh University is
to overhaul its admissions process in an attempt to admit more
students from disadvantaged backgrounds. It’s to introduce a
scoring system requiring only minimum exam grades but considering
other factors such as motivation and resourcefulness, for as its
principal Timothy O’Shea explains, exam results are not good
indicators of university performance.
This new initiative is a profound
change in educational thinking, for no matter that the exam systems
on both sides of the border have proved highly unreliable in recent
years, both pupils and schools have been judged by their results, a
view of education that is intellectual and competitive, favouring
those naturally gifted, especially when set in a class-advantaged
environment, but condemning vast numbers to failure.
Yet despite the fact that a
government commissioned study says repeated exam testing lowers
pupils self-esteem, and provokes a downward spiral of lower
motivation, less effort and even worse exam results, school pupils
in the UK face more exams and tests than anywhere else in western
Europe.
We clearly need to reconsider what we
mean by education, its purpose and who it’s for, but confusion
reigns as politicians and educationists struggle to reconcile
disparate and sometimes opposing ideals.
On the one hand education is seen as
a market, with parental choice and pupils evaluating teachers, yet
attendance is enforced by law with the threat of imprisonment for
parents and permanent exclusion for pupils if they think schooling
is irrelevant to their needs.
And at the same time as politicians
make the system more centralised and prescriptive, they deny
responsibility for any lack of moral values or social concerns in
those educated by the system they control.
The
problem, of course, is that education for life and lifelong learning
requires an understanding of the purpose of this life that we are
supposedly educating for? The Prophet spoke of education not as a
legal obligation but a religious duty. It must involve the spirit as
much as the intellect, human relationships as much as examinations
|