Groupings
You know,
when young muslims in Scotland
start to follow their own individual interests,
their personal tastes and inclinations,
they inevitably eventually encounter others who happen to be interested in the same things as they are.
But those interests they share do not necessarily require
a shared interest in,
let alone commitment to
Islam.
They spring from something more primal than Fiqh,
a deeper Islam
that is our understanding
of “me” and “other than me”,
the personal and the social.
Through shared interests humans can find ways
to share their life experience,
their shared humanity,
doing things together.
Islam may make an individual muslim life experience
more relevant and meaningful,
but the language they might use to describe their understanding of that life
is unlikely to be restricted to specifically muslim terminology
picked up along the way.
Their life experience began before they even acquired language.
A muslim life experience begins with their humanity.
The Deen is a human way of life,
and can be recognised without language.
Non-muslims can recognise honesty,
commitment, trustworthyness, selflessness, empathy,
bravery, generosity, self sacrifice, mercy,
and the embodiment of all the virtues that are recognised in human society.
Working together is possible
even when there are wide disparities of opinion between those taking part.
Practical requirements don't need philosophical agreement.
A starving person doesn't care about the religion of the one who gives them food,
though they may well look upon it with greater favour after that.
Humans learn how to negotiate relationships with other people
before they have speech,
baby to baby,
a skill that takes on more complexity and subtlety
as more age and experience leads to greater understanding of different views,
different needs and preferences.
And that skill, from its roots in one-to-one negotiation and cooperation,
when practised by larger groups can be seen as politics,
group allocation of power and resources,
control of direction, and permitted choice.
Of course, the term politics can be applied to the personal politics of family life,
as well as to the wider local and tribal elements
that are part of national and global politics.
From top to bottom it harks back to that unspoken recognition of shared humanity,
as with the touch of a handshake
exhibiting the result of long verbal negotiation.
But physical, non-verbal communication between humans is so deeply embedded
that it is almost entirely unconscious.
The back and forth of body language takes place
through all the socialising of human interaction.
From childhood play, to more adult distractions,
from simple shared meals with family and friends,
to the group chants and actions of fans in sports stadia,
humans cannot avoid the unconscious dance of body language.
Admittedly these dance moves are somewhat shaped by their cultural context,
but the expressions of virtue tend to be widely recognisable, human to human,
muslim to human.
It is said that the Messenger said that a child is born muslim,
and then its parents shape its religion.
An infant is born surrendered.
It is taught what it becomes.
It is taught by its parents and the society around it,
but that initial surrender to all that was around it,
apparently separate from it,
was the start of its journey into the unknown.
All the creation is there for us
to explore and learn from,
whatever takes our interest we can follow.
Everything can be studied in the search for understanding,
through the physical, emotional,
intellectual, spiritual and moral aspects of human life.
The muslim contribution to the global discussion of the moral aspects of human relations
is usually considered as being defined by Shari'a,
the laws extrapolated from the Qur'an,
and the communal memory of the Messenger's daily life.
But the Messenger's time
was the Messenger's time,
with its own geographical place
and historical social context,
and the Message was expressed in a way
that could be understood and accepted by those who heard it.
So laws and punishments were set in that existing society,
a lifestyle almost unimaginable to the muslims who swirl around modern cities today,
still trying to follow laws defined during very different social contexts.
As muslims nowadays relate to
the greater non-muslim community,
the moral laws we share need to be negotiated.
An understanding of morality that is at the heart of our humanity can be agreed,
and in the face of something so deeply rooted
it has to be asked whether behaviour generally accepted as preferable by humanity as a whole,
could in fact be better reflective of the deen
than the lifestyle of those muslims who despite rigorous imposition of Fiqh,
seem to have little concern for love and mercy,
or compassion for their fellow humans.
Certainly, when it comes to a model for human relations
that needs no legal definition,
God tells us that the Messenger was only sent
to be a mercy to all beings.
Which way
do you want to go?
Working
together
?
Playing
together
?
Shared
Interests
?
Shared
Way of Life
?
"When will this happen
if what you say is true?"
the Trumpet is blown
all will be filled with terror
in the heavens and the earth
except those
whom God wills
and every one
will come to Hu
humbled
that We give to those
who do not want
excess in the world
nor to spread sickness
in the end
the best outcome
belongs to those who are
Mindful of God
the world to come
and does their best for it
being a believer
those will find
their efforts are
received with thanks
"If there had been
other gods with Hu
as they say
they would surely
have tried to find
a way to reach
Hu of the Throne"
"If humans and jinn
joined forces together
to produce something
like this Reading
they could never produce
anything like it
no matter how much
they helped each other"
your Liege is God
Hu created
the heavens and the earth
in six days
then set Hu upon
the Throne
in command of
everything
no-one can plead for mercy
except by Hu's permission
that is God
your Liege
so serve Hu
will you not remember?