A WESTERN APPROACH
TO ISLAM
In
the name of God, All-Merciful, All-Compassionate
Man
was created of haste. Assuredly
I shall show you My signs; so demand not
that I make haste. (21.37)
So
be thou patient with a sweet patience;
behold, they see it as if far off,
but We
see it as nigh. (70.5-7)
Salaamu
aleikum. Oh – the last time I did this talk the room had an
echo just like that. Salaamu aleikum. (Response) Oh come on.
Is that the best you can do? It has to be good tonight,
we’ve got the television in. Well not exactly the
television, but we are making a video, so everyone on their
best behaviour, because you never know who might be looking at
you from the other side of that lens.
Actually
this is the first time I’ve done a video like this, and we
really ought to start off the folks back home with something a
little more rousing than that pathetic response I got when I
walked in. The muslims have no excuse, but for those who would
like to help out and don’t know how, I’ll go through this
once and once only. Assallam – Peace : Aleikum – upon you.
Assalaamu aleikum – Peace upon you. Like at the end of mass,
or Sholom aleichem, Peace upon you, and the answer is aleikum
– upon you : salaam – peace : aleikum salaam – upon you
peace. OK non-muslims, give it a go. Aleikum salaam. Again.
Right – I think we can try it altogether now, so I’ll just
start this talk again, and with any luck we’ll get a come on
down start to the proceedings, OK.
Salaamu
aleikum. Let’s hope that’s how this evening progresses, in
peace. Except for me of course, as when I speak of a Western
approach to Islam I mean the personal approach of a single
westerner, namely myself, which means I’ll spend most of the
evening talking about myself, again, and you are unlikely to
get me to shut up. Still, if my egocentric musings prove
useful to anyone then I hope it will be a blessing on both of
us.
First
let me explain how this evening came about. You see, last year
some of the local muslims asked me to give a talk on ‘The
Logic of Islam’, 15 minutes. “You’ve got to be
joking!” I thought. What do I do for an encore, summarize
Western European political and religious thought over the last
1400 years in two paragraphs. So I said “I tell you what –
you get whoever you want to listen, and I’ll do an evening
on it, and I wrote down what I thought was the least I could
say to do justice to the subject, and at the end of the
evening they all said “Too long – Too long”. So this
time I’m making no concessions for non-english speakers.
I’m going to talk full speed, which is where you at home
have a distinct advantage, as when it comes to dealing with
unintelligible lectures, there’s nothing like a fast forward
button on the remote control. Of course it also means that if
you would like to repeat something so you can catch the
subtleties you can always fast rewind and have an instant
replay. Now those watching the video can always pause and have
a coffee, but you can’t so let me just say get as
comfortable as you can, it will all be over in a couple of
hours, and if I go so fast that you lose track you can always
join them and watch it on the video.
Having
started, it seemed that the Logic of Islam was really the
wrong question, because logic is really only the tip of the
iceberg of what my friends 3wanted to know, as for many,
it’s what they see as making the difference between me and
them. You see logic is not something that most muslims
associate with Islam. The foundation of their association with
Islam is faith. They were muslims before they were old enough
to have much logic. But what happens to a muslim who has grown
up, and finds that faith is not so simple any more. And how
does he cope if he finds that his faith has flown out of the
window? What the muslims ask all the time is “Why did you do
it?” “Why did you become muslim>?” “What made you
become muslim?” What on earth made you decide to become
muslim?” I find it really odd that so many muslims keep
asking me why I became muslim, as though if they were in the
same situation themselves, they’re not too sure they would
have made the same choice! It doesn’t seem like they think
of what they’ve got as good tidings.
a
healing for what is in the breasts, and a guidance, and a
mercy to the believers. (10.57)
Now
there’s a thing. And who can they talk to about it with any
sort of shared understanding? Who indeed! But then how many of
us have got anyone we can talk to when it comes to things like
fear of death, or a guilty conscience, let alone a crisis of
faith. Here they are surrounded by spiritual strangers with
not much language in common so can’t really say anything
much except “How are you today? Well thank-you, etcetera.
Yet not every muslim is just here for a visit. Some of them
even manage to make friends. Human beings tend to. But
there’s still a barrier that’s hard to cross.
O
mankind, We have created you male and female, and appointed
you races and tribes, that you may know one another. (49.13)
Going
back to the beginning of the lecture, if I were to pose the
question “How many of you have ever been to any kind of
Christmas pantomime?” I could more or less guarantee that
almost all of the non-muslims would say yes, and have
recognised the style of my entrance as something that goes
along with “Oh no he didn’t – Oh yes he did” and
“He’s behind you”. It’s part of our local ongoing folk
traditions. I can also guarantee that almost all of the
muslims would be sitting on their hands. You see there’s
more to communication than a small vocabulary. I talk
completely different languages to my western friends and my
muslim friends, though they both might pass for English to the
casual observer. The first thirty odd years of my life were
spent in Britain, not Cairo or Penang or Lahore, and when I
talk to my friends the meaning of the words I use depends on
all sorts of associations which come from our shared
experience. The name of a book or a movie can convey an idea
that might take ages to explain. Politics, paintings, TV
personalities, all contribute to our shared understandings, so
it’s always easier for me to talk to Westerners, even about
Islam, that to people who come from out of the Islamic
cultural tradition itself. Especially when I often feel that
what they are calling Islam is in fact more a case of
tradition and culture than Islam, but more of that later.
Had
thy Lord willed, He would have made mankind one nation; but
they continue in their differences excepting those on whom thy
Lord has mercy. To that end He created them (11.118-119)
So
I said “If you’ve got western friends or people you work
with or anyone like that you’d like to have along, that’d
be OK Like that TV programme an Audience With Whoever, and
somebody famous spends an hour trying to amuse an audience of
celebrities. I was actually thinking of doing it like Edna
Everage or Les Patterson, but decided it would probably be a
bit too much for the majority. Anyway, my wife would have
killed me, so I didn’t. When I was going on TV I kept her on
tenterhooks telling here I was going to do it like Tim Currie
in the Rocky Horror Picture Show. It would have been a
sensation but I ended up just acting the good muslim. So An
Audience with Michael Abd al Malik eh? – Well, I guess I’m
a little bit famous – I must be if I’ve been on the telly,
though I only got the 15 minutes Andy Warhol said we were all
going to be getting.
This
present life is naught but a diversion and a sport; surely the
Last Abode is Life, did they but know. (29.64)
And
here we are and we still haven’t got to the subject. What
was the subject? Oh yes, A Western Approach to Islam. OK So
what am I trying to achieve here, anything? I think I’d like
the westerners to go away feeling that they got some kind of
insight into Islam which they wouldn’t have got from a man
speaking a foreign language. A fairly modest hope so far, one
must admit. And perhaps a feeling that there might yet be hope
for some point of common understanding between them and their
bizarre muslim neighbours.
And
as for those bizarre muslim neighbours, I hope I have
something to offer that may be of some use in approaching the
west and perhaps in the process do something to help save the
loss of your children. It may be that the cultural differences
I’ve mentioned will meant that you don’t understand a word
I say, but I have spent many hours sitting surrounded by
Arabic or Urdu speakers not understanding a word, and found
the best solution is to just relax and smile and let the words
float past your ears without trying to force them towards the
brain. Many hours, actually, so it really is my turn. What I
was saying about language and culture, however, is of course
particularly relevant to those of you who are not just
travelling through, because your children, whether you like it
or not are growing up British not Pakistanis, and if you
can’t show them a way to be British muslims as opposed to
Pakistani muslims, then the chances are they will end up as
just plain British. To do that, however, involves the tricky
business of examining all those values that you have always
unquestioningly accepted as Islamic, and seeing whether they
might not in fact just be part of your culture traditions. Now
this is thin ice, so we must tread carefully. But you have to
consider what you grandfathers taught, and se just how
relevant it is to you now, here and face it with honesty if
you want to do what is right for yourselves as well as your
children.
That
is a nation that has passed away; there awaits them that they
have earned, and there awaits you that you have earned; you
shall not be questioned concerning the things they did.
(2.134)
When
I first mentioned the title ‘A Western Approach to Islam’
the first response was ‘But that might give the impression
that there is more than one kind of Islam – and we all know
that isn’t so’ Well, it may not be so in theory, but
anyone with half an eye can see that it is so in practise, and
I have practised my Islam in quite a few different countries,
but this is my home turf, so like Frank Sinatra I’m gonna do
it my way.
I
was 33 when I began thinking of myself as some kind of muslim
and had to deal with each question of muslim thought and
behaviour consciously and as best I could. So what I’m
eventually going to try and go through in this talk is a sort
of Islam for fully grown infants. ‘You mean this talk
hasn’t started yet? I hear you cry. Don’t worry, it’s a
bit like a James Bond film, where it’s been going for half
an hour before you get the opening credits –
Bismillahirrahmannirrahim – and the movie starts for real.
But we’ve finished the pre-credits, you’ll notice I just
got in the Bismillah, and I promise you the exciting stuff is
really about to start. After that we’ll wake up the sleeping
and we’ll finally get to press the pause button here and
have a break and tea and buns. So as you lot sit there
wondering whether it was worth turning on the TV, you can
console yourselves with the thought that although it’s all
over for you, here the hard core will be back for questions
and answers, if I still have any voice left. Is everybody
comfortable? Does anyone want to have a break now? Don’t
bother to answer that, they wouldn’t stop James Bond for
you, and they won’t stop me. But first the credits, and as
Max Headroom would say ‘Let’s talk about me”.
You
know times have changed since I was born. When I was three
years old the men came home from the second great war in
Europe this century and tried to settle down and make things
just the way they were before and hope things worked out
better this time. Some of the early members of the Alvin
Toffler generation had had enough, however, and it seemed like
time for a change. But the time I was in my teens I was
singing like Elvis Presley, had a haircut like Eddie Cochran,
and had the smoothest of lines with the girls on the bus home
from school. Mind you, I had to be quick, there were no girls
allowed at the Catholic Grammar, so I had to indulge my
teenage longings with maximum concentration during the journey
home. Certainly I seemed to be getting a different set of
behavioural instructions from the priests at school than the
ones I was getting direct from my body functions on the bus.
There,
perhaps, began the first breakdown in my trust and acceptance
of the morals of my elders. They didn’t make too good a
logical case for their arguments, but having had control over
me since infancy, they could sure make me feel guilty for even
thinking about what was in those less liberated days at the
most an extreme improbability. Give me a boy until he is
twelve and I will make him mine for life said some Jesuit, and
they nearly did. But finally I left home to go to University,
and away from the cage of church and family I discovered that
my conscience was a great deal more flexible than I had
thought, and it was no good the church fathers just telling
those were the rules and I had no option but to obey them,
because it was soon clear that I had lots and lots of options.
So that was when I stopped thinking of myself as a Christian
and started thinking of myself as an agnostic. I only knew
that I didn’t know what the hell it was all about, and that
I was going to try and find out for myself. After a few years
as a student, and then working in the theatre, I had made
plenty of mistakes, but at least I felt I was living according
to a set of rules that had some grounding in my own
understanding and experience. Even so there were some serious
problems.
Part
of the problem seems to be that you plunge into the deep end
of life with the boundless self-assurance of youth, with the
highest possible ideals and intention, and with the perfect
plan of action , yet in a few months you are up to you neck in
it, miserable as sin, and scared stiff of drowning. And some
people do, but most people flounder to some unsatisfactory way
out of their problems, reflect on it as a ‘learning
experience’, get their breath, and jump right back in again.
I did frequently, and by the time that I had reached the end
of my twenties, I was finally beginning to consider that maybe
I was going about things the wrong way. I was quite successful
in my work. I could pick and choose what I wanted to do, and
was being paid well for doing what in my youth I had done for
pleasure. Through the sixties rejection of materialism,
dogmatism, and the thought patters of the industrial
revolution, I was working in a field conspicuous for its
nurturing of personal creativity, and freedom of individual
expression. Working in a job, a large part of the essential
purpose of which was commenting on the human condition, only
served to highlight the fact that I was unable to answer my
own most important questions. How was it possible that I was a
success in virtually everything I did, and was still miserable
and dissatisfied. What I had was a philosophical crisis, and
one thing I knew about philosophy was that there was no point
in looking for an answer. The trick is to look for the right
question. And so we come to the next theme “What is the
meaning of Life?” – Part II – beyond Monty Python.
When
I was a kid, sometime in my teens, I went to the Planetarium
in London, and the wise old astronomer was talking of the
immense distances of the universe and the mind-boggling number
crunching enormity of it all, and he concluded by saying
pretty much “If the thought of all this makes you feel small
and utterly insignificant to the Universe then that’s
because that’s the way it is.” And yes, I had heard all
the big numbers, and seen the photographs of distant nebulae,
but there was absolutely no question about it, I disagreed.
Like I am sure most of the other kids, I knew that without me
the Universe might as well not be there. It could be thought
of as simple teenage vanity, but I like to think of it as an
experiential certainty of personal importance, on the basis
that if it’s something you shouldn’t have throw big words
at it and turn it into something else. In school I was a maths
and science whiz, though at home I was more into psychology
and art. Mostly, of course, I was into rock and roll. I think
we did a bit of philosophy in our Religious Knowledge classes,
well I know we did actually, because I remember learning reams
of Thomas Aquinas, and the teacher struggling valiantly with
Hegel, but most of the teenagers I knew didn’t talk about
philosophy too much. We all thought we were going to live
forever, and there’d be plenty of time for all that later.
Perhaps I was right. Anyway it was the philosophers I went to
first when I was having my life crisis. I was having problems
with the “I think therefore I am” bit and remember being
quite fond of Nietszche’s “It thinks therefore I am”
though I didn’t fancy all his ideas so much. Perhaps “It
knows therefore I am” would have been best. But -
He
knows the thoughts within the breasts. (35.38)
I
remember spacing out on Berkeley and Hume and the idealists,
and at one stage I was getting a bit worried as everyone I
seemed to read and agree with died suicidal or in an insane
asylum. While the Beatles were with the Maharishi I was in the
twilight zone. But I came through it by the time I got up to
Russell and Popper and Wittgenstein as it seemed to have come
down to mathematics and linguistics. So Russell wrote about
relativity, and that got me back into science. Which now
seemed a whole lot less reliable than it did in my teens. It
now seemed important to remember that when you are working in
the lab you tend to throw away the results that don’t fit
the theory, and suddenly I was reading about the non-objective
role of the observer, and science not only changed its limits,
but its quality. Going from the outer space of the Planetarium
to the inner space of atomic theory didn’t present me with
anything more solid. I just ended up with a great
Heisenbergian uncertainty, and the Tao of Physics. Not to
mention Einstein. Oh dear, there we go, and I said I wasn’t
going to mention Einstein, but you have to admit that
Relativity did put the cat among the pigeons. Whatever
happened to the time? Well, it’s unlikely to be the same
again. In the States I had a friend who lived near me in Santa
Fe. He had previously been a research physicist, but he
couldn’t reconcile working with non-linear time in theory
and linear time in practise. So he gave it all up, studied Zen
and Gurdjieff, started working as a plumber and eventually
found time for a good time.
To
Him the angels and the Spirit mount up in a day whereof the
measure is a thousand years. (70.4)
So
the scientists seemed to have some difficulty coming up with
anything in the way of solid answers. But I though what about
mathematics, you know two and two is four, you can’t argue
with that can you? Well, as a matter of fact you can and they
do. When I looked into it I found that what mathematicians
deal with bears as much relationship to what you learnt at
school as chalk and cheese. Cantor’s multiple infinities
were tricky enough, and then along came Godel of Escher and
Bach fame to prove fairly conclusively that numbers don’t
have anything to do with the real world – they’re just
intellectual systems.
How
is it with this Book, that it leaves nothing behind, small or
great, but it has numbered it?" (18.49)
and
He encompasses all that
is with them, and He has numbered everything in numbers."
(72.28)
You
know, if you take a number and multiply it by itself you
always get a positive number. So plus two times plus two is
four, and minus two times minus tow is four. To get a minus
four you have to multiply plus two by minus two and they’re
different numbers. So you can ask what number multiplied by
itself gives us four and get the answer two or minus two, but
there is no number that multiplies with itself to give minus
four, so there is no point in asking the question. The same
with the ones, plus one times plus one is one, minus one times
minus one is one, so the square root of one is plus one or
minus one, but there is no square root of minus one. OK so
far? ~Then some mathematician decides that it would actually
be quite useful to have a square root of minus one, he thinks
of all these great equations he could play around with if he
had one, so he decides to pretend there is one and the
equations work a treat. Pretend sums we’re talking about
here, and this is what they get up to in the universities with
their government grants, making up numbers and playing with
them. You can imagine what would happen if you tried it in
Presto’s “Excuse me miss could you please add up my bill
using this number I’ve just invented ‘cause it makes
everything only half the price.” They’d send for the men
in the white suits.
And
then some physicist comes along and says Hey, look at this
cute wee imaginary number - I want a go of that – and he
likes it so much that he uses it all the time. So he’s away
with the fairies as well, except that the next thing you know
he uses it in some formula and we’ve got nuclear powered
electricity coming out of our sockets made out of a number
that somebody made up. When we switch on the light it’s just
pretend electricity! And if you think that’s weird just ask
a mathematician about the Banach Tarski paradox, where you can
take a solid object, divide it into four pieces, and when you
put it together again it’s two solid objects the same size
as the first one, and I just can’t wait for some physicist
to deal with the practical side of that. You take a can of
beans off the shelf, put it in the Banach Tarski paradox box,
press the button, then take one can out and eat the beans and
put the original back on the shelf to use next time. Hey
Presto’s.
In
the earth are signs for those having sure faith; and in your
selves; what, do you not see? And in heaven is your provision,
and that you are promised. So by the Lord of heaven and earth,
it is surely true as that you have speech. (51.20-23)
So
I didn’t get a lot of answers from the mathematicians,
though I did get a whole new bundle of questions, and it seems
that they no longer make any claims to objective truth, and
judge the rightness of their answers in terms of their Beauty.
“How do you know that’s the right answer?” “Well
it’s really pretty”. Mostly they seemed to agree with
Jorge Luis Borges, who said that when God made the world He
made it appear really solid, but in case we got to thinking
that this solidity was the real thing, He left a couple of
reminders that it isn’t and they are ideas of paradox and
infinity.
Did
you hear that sneaky little word “God” slip in there
almost unnoticed? We must be getting close to the nitty
gritty. You know, when I first started to try and deal with
all this, I refused point blank to use the word. After all, I
had given up my Christianity because that white bearded old
man up in the clouds idea seemed more like pie in the sky to
me, and any answers I’d got to subtler questions about an
everywhere God had seemed confused and impossible to relate to
“The Church” as I knew it. So I dropped the word “God”
altogether as a bit of an intellectual embarrassment, and
talked in terms of agnosticism, the search for knowledge, the
truth, the ultimate, the infinite. Yet as I tried to
understand what it was that I really believed in, none of the
alternatives seemed to be enough. After Cantor, even the
Infinite seemed inadequate. In fact, the only word that had
the breadth of definition to express what I believed in –
“God” seemed to have been reduced to some kind of
meaningless all purpose sentence filler. God alone knows what
the average punter out there thinks it means, for God’s
sake. God help us. God’s dead isn’t He? Oh God! After
months of intensive study, I end up concluding that the one
word that sums up what I believe in has no meaning. There is
no God. Except God.
It
is God who splits the grain and the date-stone, brings forth
the living from the dead; He brings forth the dead too from
the living. So that then is God; then how are you perverted?
He
splits the sky into dawn, and has made the night for a repose,
and the sun and moon for a reckoning. That is the ordaining of
the All-mighty, the All-knowing.
It
is He who has appointed for you the stars, that by them you
may be guided in the shadows of land and sea. We have
distinguished the signs for a people who know.
It
is He who produced you from one living soul, and then a
lodging-place, and then a repository. We have distinguished
the signs for a people who understand.
It
is He who sent down out of heaven water, and thereby We have
brought forth the shoot of every plant, and then We have
brought forth the green leaf of it, bringing forth from it
close-compounded grain, and out of the palm-tree, from the
spathe of it, dates thick-clustered, ready to the hand, and
gardens of vines, olives, pomegranates, like each to each, and
each unlike to each. Look upon their fruits when they fructify
and ripen! Surely, in all this are signs for a people who do
believe. (6.95-99)
Or
has he not been told of what is in the scrolls of Moses.
and Abraham, he who paid his debt in full?
That no soul laden bears the load of another,
and that a man shall have to his account only as he has
laboured,
and that his labouring shall surely be seen,
then he shall be recompensed for it with the fullest
recompense,
and that the final end is unto thy Lord,
and that it is He who makes to laugh, and that makes to weep,
and that it is He who makes to die, and that makes to live,
and that He himself created the two kinds, male and female,
of a sperm-drop, when it was cast forth,
and that upon Him rests the second growth,
and that it is He who gives wealth and riches,
and that
it is He who is the Lord of Sirius (53.36-49)
With
Him are the keys of the Unseen; none knows them but He. He
knows what is in land and sea; not a leaf falls, but He knows
it. Not a grain in the earth's shadows, not a thing, fresh or
withered, but it is in a Book Manifest.
It
is He who recalls you by night, and He knows what you work by
day: then He raises you up therein, that a stated term may be
determined; then unto Him shall you return (6.59-60)
Having
realised what I was looking for, I thought that the obvious
thing to do in the circumstance was check out the folks who
make it their speciality, so I started to read up on religion.
Having escaped the stifling clutches of formalised religion
once, however, I was not in the mood to abandon my grey matter
completely, and started off with the idea that if there was
any fundamental truth concerning the body of mankind in its
entirety, and how it should related to the surrounding
universe, then this knowledge would probably be evident in all
the great world religions. The Strange thing is that the
similarities are so great that it is almost impossible to
understand how the different religions have spent most of
history butchering each other instead of trying to share their
knowledge for the betterment of all mankind. But in the words
of Kurt Vonnegut, “So it goes”.
man
is the most disputatious of things (18.54)
And
it’s not just the lineage of Abraham. When the Dalai Lama
came to Glasgow, the chairperson talked of everyone there
believing in God, and all the Buddhists round me were going
“No we don’t! No we don’t!” The Dalai Lama didn’t,
of course, he just sat there and smiled. But to any Tibetan
Buddhists out there I would like to say to you – “Yes you
do! Yes you do!” What we differ on is a linguistic problem.
Any Buddhist knows that in attempting to describe anything we
might know as a God, all we can do is describe the veils of
our selves, our nafs, the limits of our imagination and
understanding. That’s OK by me. I consider my God to be
beyond description also. Yet to talk bout what is other than
the manifest world, you need a word, a name. If you like you
can call it the Great Void, the indescribable not-being.
However you try to encapsulate it, no that’s not it. And out
of the void, as we approach the manifestation of being, or
creation as I call it, what is the first recognisable
attribute. The Great Compassion.
Muslims
have a phrase that they use hundreds of times every day. When
they start to pray, when they start the car, when they start
to eat. Bismillah, By the Name Allah, Only a name, not a
description, as Allah is indescribable. But we do have words
by which we may approach an understanding, and the first of
these is Rahman, and the second is Rahim, the two aspects of
Compassion and Mercy. That’s what I said at the start of the
talk, Bidmillahirrahmanirrahim. By the name Allah, All Mercy,
All Compassion, and there is enough in that phrase to fill
more than one lecture. But if it’s all so airy-fairy and
indescribable how does understanding come into it. How does
one form judgements about what to believe. Is it faith or
nothing? Blind Faith? What a band!
And
some men there are who say, "We believe in God and the
Last Day"; but they are not believers. (2.8)
When
it is said to them, "Do not corruption in the land",
they say, "We are only ones that put things right."
Truly they are the workers of corruption but they are not
aware. (2.11-12)
What,
does not God know very well what is in the breasts of all
beings? God surely knows the believers, and He knows the
hypocrites. (29.10-11)
If
there is one thing that most of the great religions men seem
to agree on it is that the first thing you need is faith –
usually in them – and that the desire for understanding is
something if not to be frowned upon, at most an unnecessary
luxury. Yet there are some strong traditions to suggest
otherwise. When the Prophet first offered his message to the
tribes in Makkah, he stood on a hillside and said “Do you
trust me enough that if I told you there was an army
approaching from the other side of this hill would you believe
me? And they all said “Yes. Of course. You are an honest
man.” He appealed to their experience and understanding
first, and when they had made a judgement about that, he said
OK – If you would have believed in that which you can’t
see, then believe this which you can’t see, and they all
went “One God? The man’s gone mad!” – except a very
few. Most of them came around in the end though.
Is
it not time that the hearts of those who believe should be
humbled to the Remembrance of God and the Truth which He has
sent down, and that they should not be as those to whom the
Book was given aforetime, and the term seemed over long to
them, so that their hearts have become hard, and many of them
are ungodly?
Know
that God revives the earth after it was dead. We have indeed
made clear for you the signs, that haply you will understand.
(57.16- 17)
Have
they not regarded the birds, that are subjected in the air of
heaven? Naught holds them but God; surely in that are signs
for a people who believe. (16.79)
All
the traditions agree on another thing also, which is that you
can’t get it all from books, so after a year or so of
intensive reading, I decided to accept the consensus opinion
that if you are hungry for knowledge, then you can speed the
process up considerably by going off and looking for it.
It
is not for the believers to go forth totally; but why should
not a party of every section of them go forth, to become
learned in religion, and to warn their people when they return
to them, that haply they may beware? (9.122)
Well,
I had nothing much better to do, so I set off on what often
turned out to be a pretty magical journey. It can be tricky
putting the theory into practice, trying to find a method to
combat the madness. Dumping the accumulated guilt and anguish
over failures of the past, as well as learning to quell the
fears for an uncertain future, and trust that these things
would ultimately be taken care of. Living in the Now. A
non-repeatable but ongoing method. Looking for guidance and
learning to recognise it, and realising that one can in fact
rely on Truth and patience.
Especially
Truth. All my life I had been someone who like most people
thought that truth was of course desirable in the ideal
situation, but situations were so rarely ideal that I spent
most of my time trying to remember what I had told to whom. To
decide that the situation was in fact as ideal as it was going
to get, so I might as well tell the truth all the time, and
then find out how much easier it made things, was a
revelation. After all those years to finally see that if you
aren’t speaking the truth yourself, you can never hope to
access the truth of what surrounds you. And then to find it in
Islam, a rigorous concern for the truth. War is lies, said the
Prophet, and that was just about the only excuse accepted.
We
created not the heavens and earth, and all that between them
is, in play; We created them not save in truth; but most of
them know it not. (44.38-39)
It
is He who made the sun a radiance, and the moon a light,
and determined it by stations, that you might know the
number of the years and the reckoning. God created that not
save with the truth, distinguishing the signs to a people who
know. (10.5)
That
is because God makes the night to enter into the day and makes
the day to enter the night; and that God is All-hearing,
All-seeing.
That
is because God - He is the Truth, and that they call upon
apart from Him - that is the false; and for that God is the
All-high, the All-great.
Hast
thou not seen how that God has sent down out of heaven water,
and in the morning the earth becomes green? God is All-subtle,
All-aware.
To
Him belongs all that is in the heavens and in the earth;
surely God - He is the All-sufficient, the All-laudable.
(22.61-64)
I
don’t have time to tell much of the journey, or show you my
holiday snaps, but I spent my time learning that if you trust
you are protected, and if you look for guidance you are
guided, and after some months I was guided to the southern end
of the Rocky Mountains, where I met my first group of real
life practising muslims, and I bet that, considering the title
of the lecture, you were beginning to wonder if it would ever
happen, much like myself at the time.
Half
way through, and we’ve just met the muslims.
So
when did I become muslim? Like Catholicism, Islam tends to
come in a complete package according to the most commonly
heard opinions. To think of yourself as a muslim you have to
take it all. Not so
The
unbelievers say, "Why has the Koran not been sent down
upon him all at once?" Even so, that We may strengthen
thy heart thereby (25.32)
Now
any westerner worth his salt is not going to let anyone else
decide for him how much he is going to believe and when. And
he will choose his own form of worship, thank you very much.
Like the Quraish, who mostly ended up as the Companions. So if
he accepts things a little at a time, when does he become a
muslim? If he is a muslim anywhere between not being a muslim
and the complete package, the package is not necessary. So
what is? Witnessing that there is no God – except God. And
recognising that there is no point in a life without that
remembrance. Shahada. There is no God – except God. And what
did the first muslims think about it? Well it was quite
literally a matter of life and death for some. People were
martyred for it. And to say it, even without belief could be
enough to save your life. There is a story of how in one of
the battles a muslim was chasing one of the enemy who turned
and said “There is no God but God” very quickly, as you
would, and the muslim said “Aye – I’ll believe you”
and chopped his head off. So the Prophet hauled him over the
coals and said “What do you think you were doing, killing
your muslim brother?” and your boy says “He was not. He
was just saying it to get off home in one piece.” The reply
came “When you cut him open could you see what was written
on his soul?”
La
ilaha illa Allah. There is no god except God. My first night
on the mountain was the first time anyone had spoken the
phrase to me. And it was a woman by the way – if that makes
it seem any less valid to the traditionalists out there. She
asked me if I knew what it meant, and with the radiant
confidence of ignorance I said “Yes, of course.” Now, a
dozen years later I’m not so sure, but I keep trying.
What
I had been learning while I was travelling, I was later to
think of as Tawhid. The Unity of that everywhere God of my
catechism I had almost forgotten. Not only with what was
outside me
To
God belongs the East and the West; whithersoever you turn,
there is the Face of God; God is All-embracing, All-knowing.
(2.115)
But
also with what was inside me
We
indeed created man; and We know what his soul whispers within
him,
and We are nearer to him than the jugular vein. (50.16)
That
then is God your Lord; there is no god but He, the Creator of
everything. So serve Him, for He is Guardian over everything.
The eyes attain Him not, but He attains the eyes; He is the
All-subtle, the All-aware. (6.102-103)
The
God of the nomad hitch-hiker.
Where
I had arrived there were people of all sorts of religious
persuasions, but all with a shared purpose of trying to find
out the things that unite man, and if you look for them they
are many.
God
is He that created you of weakness, then He appointed after weakness strength, then after strength He appointed
weakness and grey hairs; He creates what He will, and He is
the All-knowing, the All-powerful. (30.54)
Every
soul shall taste of death; and We try you with evil and good
for a testing, then unto Us you shall be returned. (21.35)
With
this assortment of strangers I not only learned a bit about
all sorts of strange practises, but I also began to learn more
about the organ we have been given to help unify mankind, the
heart. The muslims, however, were living somewhat apart, and I
first really came to meet them when we all went to help them
move some adobe bricks, and when it came to lunch time they
all went off to the half built mosque instead of eating,
though I wasn’t quite sure what was involved at the time.
the
month of Ramadan, wherein the Koran was sent down to be a
guidance to the people, and as clear signs of the Guidance and
the Salvation. (2.185)
After
a while, I heard this strange noise – La ilaha illa Allah
– I just had to check it out, and when I saw it like wind in
the long grass I thought – ‘Now that looks like fun’. So
I saw the sheikh and asked if I could join in, and every
Thursday I would meet with them to explore different kinds of
Dzikr. It means Remembrance. A short phrase repeated over and
over to remind you what you’re dealing with.
So,
what are the most commonly repeated dzikr. After their prayers
most muslims will repeat Subhanallah, Alhamdulillah,
Allahuakbar.
Subhanallah.
As one Indian friend put it ito me “God is the most
clean.” No spot, no blemish, no stain, no mistakes. I like
to think of it as the embodiment of the fact that whatever was
in the past was beyond recall, so one might as well accept it
and get on with what comes next, and not waste any more energy
having hot flushes over embarrassing moments that everyone
else has forgotten, or suffering endless guilt for brief
mistakes. We all make them. One careless prod of the finger
and all hell breaks loose, and “I didn’t mean to do it! I
didn’t mean to do it!” But worrying about it now is a
waste of time, as now it is over and done with, so there’s
no need to keep agonising about it, unless you happen to enjoy
your agony. Then, however, it was exactly what we were
supposed to get to deal with. It was not a mistake.
Subhanallah.
Alhamdulillah.
All praise belongs to God. Al-Ghazali talks of the Hamd being
praise based in gratitude, which is the beginning of the
straight path along with patience, though gratitude is
superior to patience as mercy is to anger, as gratitude
proceeds from joy and unlike patience is free from distress
and sorrow. Free from distress and sorrow, the ideal way to
experience the immediate moment, in fact. Alhamdulillah.
Allahuakbar.
God is Great. Now, whatever the anguish or uncertainty over
the future, God can change the situation with bravura
demonstrations of power at any moment, and the future can be
transformed for us with ease, and all the worry will have been
wasted. How many times have we all been in a position where we
couldn’t see our way past the end of the week. No way out.
This is it. This is the big one. And now we look back and hey,
it wasn’t so bad after all. The future was changed beyond
our imagining. Allahuakbar.
So
that takes care of living with the past, Subhanallah, the
present, Alhamdulillah, and the future, Allahuakbar, and to
sum it all up we can say La ilaha illa Allah.
Now
I can see the muslims squirming in their seats because I keep
saying La ilaha illa Allah, and they don’t understand why I
haven’t yet tacked on the phrase that they would all join on
to it without a moment’s thought, Muhammad rasul Allah. Now
here we have a good case of what I was saying earlier about
dealing with each aspect of Islam as a conscious adult. La
ilaha illa Allah Muhammad rasul Allah was probably one of the
first things that any of them learned to say. Yet after saying
the first half, I couldn’t say the second half until I had
spent three months trying to work out what I meant by it.
Let’s start with the end first, as that is the easiest.
Allah. God The God to be more precise, not any old god, but
The One God. We have here just a slight problem in that the
muslims like to call God Allah, because their lineage comes
through the Arabic language. But for those who wish to create
dissent, one of the easier ways is to suggest that because
they use a different language they are talking about different
things. Remember it’s not some heathen idol we’re talking
about. Allah is Who the Arabic speaking Christians pray to as
well.
Say:
"People of the Book! Come now to a word common between us
and you, that we serve none but God, and that we associate not
aught with Him, and do not some of us take others as Lords,
apart from God." (3.64)
And
what do we mean by Rasul. A messenger? From God? How is that
possible, let alone why would it be necessary? Here we are,
poor mystified mankind, wandering in the dark, struggling
throughout history to cope with living in an eminently
unintelligible universe, desperately trying to make some sense
of what we are doing here. We pick our way across this
uncharted territory in the pitch dark, and every now and then
there is a light, a flash of inspiration, just enough to help
guide us a little further on the way, or just enough to scare
the pants off us by showing us how easy it would be to step
into a ravine or something equally nasty.
It
is He who shows you the lightning, for fear and hope (13.12)
As
in our day to day lives, so in history. A few special people
have been given a window of understanding, the ability to see
in our dark, and they pass on the directions to others. And
they bring us good news that there’s a nice straight path
with no thorn bushes, no potholes, no problems, just keep
walking. And they also give us a warning of what happens if we
insist on ignoring them and going our own sweet way – snakes
in the grass.
We
sent Messengers before thee; of some We have related to thee,
and some We have not related to thee. It was not for any
Messenger to bring a sign, save by God's leave. (40.78)
Indeed,
We sent forth among every nation a Messenger, saying: "
Serve you God, and eschew idols." (16.36)
And
We gave to Moses the Book, and after him sent succeeding
Messengers; and We gave Jesus son of Mary the clear signs, and
confirmed him with the Holy Spirit; (2.87)
Surely
We have sent thee with the truth good tidings to bear, and
warning; not a nation there is, but there has passed away in
it a warner. (35.24)
The
Messenger believes in what was sent down to him from his Lord,
and the believers; each one believes in God and His angels,
and in His Books and His Messengers; we make no division
between any one of His Messengers. (2.285)
And
that brings us to Muhammad, and a sever stumbling block for
those of us who come out of the Christian tradition. I don’t
remember too much about what I learned of Jesus when I was
very small, though I do member reading about the lives of the
saints, and I watched various TV versions of the New Testament
at times. But as with most children, I knew all about the
nativity, as Christmas was the highlight of my year, though I
suppose that if I had got the presents, I wouldn’t have
cared if it had been in aid of Wodin or Thor. The old
Testament needed Cecil B. de Mille and Charlton Heston, and it
really seemed more like StarWars than something to be taken
seriously, but by the time I was a man, I could tell you a
fair bit about the life of Christ or the Old Testament
prophets. There was one person, however, who had had a
transforming influence on a huge area of the world for
fourteen hundred years of Christian history, and of whom I had
heard virtually nothing. I suppose I knew vaguely that he was
some kind of anti-christ, and I had read Dante, so I knew that
he was in something like the ninth level of hell, as close to
the Devil as you could get, along with the people who ate
babies and stuff like that, but one could largely say that the
Christian west dealt with Islamic history by pretending it
wasn’t there.
In
fact later, when I started to take a more personal interest in
what had been European attitudes over the years, I was amazed
by the vitriolic quality of what had been written about him.
Perhaps with the best of intentions, this intellectual
extension of the Crusades seemed to carry on through the
centuries with an unquestioning acceptance of the factual
basis of any prior ill-informed polemic, while at the same
time curtly dismissing the capability of the heathen to form
any sort of intelligent or rational judgement about the matter
for himself. The arrogance of Muhammad’s western biographers
rises up off the page and hits one in the eyes with such
breathtaking pomposity that it is almost impossible to believe
that these people could be taken seriously. But there were,
and sad to say, they still are. The world of academia changes
very, very slowly. So all things considered, it is probably
not too surprising if the average westerner has the impression
that Muhammad was a violent sex-crazed epileptic camel driver.
What is even more remarkable is that he seems to have
persuaded thousands of millions of people to think he was any
different.
So
let’s look at another view of the man.
Muhammad.
His name means the Praiseworthy.
Muhammad
was forbearing, honest, just and chaste. He was the most
generous of men. Neither a dinar or a dirham was left him in
the evening. If anything remained and there was no one to give
it to, night having fallen suddenly, he would not retire to
his apartment until he was able to give this excess to whoever
needed it. He was never asked for anything but that he gave it
to the asker. He would prefer the seeker to himself and his
family, and so often his store of grain for the year was used
up before the end of the year. He patches his sandals and
clothing, did household chores, and ate with his women-folk.
He was shy and would not stare into people’s faces. He
answered the invitation of the slave and the free-born, and he
accepted presents even if they consisted of merely a draught
of milk or a rabbits leg, while because of hunger he would at
times tie two stones around his stomach.
He
attended feast, visited the sick, attended funerals, and
walked among his enemies without a guard. He was the humblest
of men, the most silent without being insolent, and the most
eloquent without being lengthy. He was always joyful and never
awed by the affairs of this world. He rode a horse, a male
camel, a mule, an ass, he walked barefoot and bareheaded at
different times. He loved perfumes and disliked foul smells.
He sat and ate with the poor. He tyrannized nobody and
accepted the excuse of the one who begged his pardon.
He
joked, but he only spoke the truth. He laughed but did not
burst out laughing. He did not eat better food or wear better
clothes than his servants.
He
refused to curse his enemy, saying “I was sent to forgive
not to curse.” When asked to wish evil on anyone he blessed
them instead.
If
there was a bed he slept on it, if not he reclined on the
earth. He was always the first to extend a greeting. In a
handshake he was never the first to release his hand. He
preferred his guest over himself and would offer the cushion
on which he reclined until it was accepted. One did not argue
in his presence. He only spoke the truth. He was the most
smiling and laughing of men. He never found fault with his
food. If he was pleased with it he ate it, and if he dislike
it he left it. If he disliked it he did not make it hateful to
someone else. He did not eat very hot food, and he ate what
was in front of him on the plate, within his reach, eating
with three fingers. He wiped the dish clean with his fingers
saying “The last morsel is very blessed.” He did not wash
his hands until he had licked them clean of food. He quaffed
milk but sipped water.
A
man came to him who was overawed by his presence and became
reverential towards him. He said to him “Be at rest. I am
not a king. I am only the son of a woman of the Quraish who
eats dried meat.” His answer to his name was “At your
service.”
We
have not sent thee, save as a mercy unto all beings. Say:
"It is revealed unto me only that your God is One God; do
you then surrender?" (21.107-108)
So
here is a man who knew the way, always smiling and happy,
unafraid, beloved of everyone who knew him. What was his
secret? What was the most important thing in his life? Is
there any unifying thread that distinguishes his life from
ours, some behaviour pattern that we can emulate. Indeed there
have been few characters in history whose behaviour has been
detailed in such depth, so it shouldn’t bee too hard to find
out.
Famous
last words. Remember the muslims have their own academics
ready to mould the information into a reflection of
themselves. The behavioural form of Muhammad is known as the
sunna, but what we have left of it is in the form of ahadith,
sayings, things the prophet said and things that his
companions said about him and what he did. And it is all now
preserved as a vast academic discipline. What we have to
remember is that in preserving something it is only too easy
to kill the life force within it. This is not to say that
there is no need for the study of the reliability of the
ahadith and their transmitters, as this springs from a
necessary concern for the truth of the matter, but in
preserving the instances of what he did, the outer form, let
us not lose sight of the inner form, why he did it. The what
tends to tie us to the prophets own time and place, and indeed
the world is full of muslims walking around looking over their
shoulders back to a golden age, and walking into present day
walls. Does following the sunna really mean that we have to
end up with a stiff neck and bruises? Should we not be looking
at what confronts us now to be dealt with, and attempting to
understand how he would have approached the problem here in
our place. The Caliphs, the representatives of the prophet
were not just the successors to his political power. As
muslims we are each and every one of us representatives of the
prophet here in whatever situation we are in, and should try
to act in the manner he would want to act. In the same way
that as children of Adam we are the representatives of God in
this world, and should try to act as He would want us to act.
And
when thy Lord said to the angels, "I am setting in the
earth a viceroy." They said, "What, wilt thou set
therein one who will do corruption there, and shed blood,
while We proclaim Thy praise and call Thee Holy?" He
said, "Assuredly I know that you know not." (2.30)
So
what are the most important aspects of the prophet’s
behaviour. We can clearly see the inner form, compassion,
mercy, gentleness, humility, generosity, patience, truth. But
what of the outer form? Is it that he ate with three fingers
and rode on a camel? Is there anything that he himself said
was important? Well, as a matter of fact there was. He said
whatever else you discard hang on to these things or
everything else will fall apart. Live your own life in your
own way, but these things are indispensable. They are easy
enough to remember, there’s only five of them. They are
usually known as the five pillars.
The
first pillar we have actually dealt with about as thoroughly
as is possible considering the time we’ve had available.
Shahada. Bearing witness that there is just one God. Credo
inUnum Deum. That’s it. Stop there, let’s not complicate
the issue. We’ve done that one.
The
next pillar takes a little more time and effort. It’s prayer
Prosperous
is he who has cleansed himself, and mentions the Name of his
Lord, and prays. (87.14-15)
I
was busy exploring all the other religious practices that
surrounded me at the time, and then exploring the American
countryside for a while, but eventually I came back to the
mountain, and though it was time I concentrated my efforts a
bit. I was going to be taking part in a Vipassana mediation
retreat, but decided to have a bit of a rest first, and went
off to a hermitage for a week or so. While I was there I
thought I ought to see if I could make any sense out of
prayer, and what a surprise. As a kid, it had felt like just a con. I mean, I went through the motions, but I really
didn’t think there was anybody out there to talk to. Now I
knew that there wasn’t any “Body” out there, yet when I
used words, things started to slot into place. So Off I went
to talk to the sheikh again, and over the next couple of
months I learned the muslm prayer form, and into the bargain
made my first Ramadan.
There
are two kinds of prayer. One is Du’a, which is what one
usually thinks of as prayer in this part of the world, asking
for something or somewhat that you want. This is an excellent
form of praying, but as I was trying to want what I got
instead of getting what I wanted, I didn’t do it too much,
which was OK as it is not the one that is important.
The
pillar is the Salaat, or the namaz. It is not and asking for
something different, but more like a recognition of the way
things are and a submission to it and an acceptance of it. It
is compulsory in that it is indispensable, yet it is only a
hardship to those who can’t enjoy
it. Like eating it is a necessity, which can be
relished or taken on the run, but nor rejected completely,
else like the anorexic one is in a state of sickness. But
starvation is easy to recognise, while the sickness of the
spirit is much harder to appraise. For that reason we have
been given guidance as to the essential for our health. It is
made five times a day. At dawn, after mid-day, late afternoon,
after sunset, and in the dark of the night. By examining our
relationship with our salaat in this daily fashion, we have a
yardstick by which to measure ourselves, and a fixed base from
which to explore ourselves.
surely
the prayer is a timed prescription for the believers. (4.103)
To
make the salaat you must be clean. More than clean, you must
be in a state of wudu. This is a specific form of washing the
purpose of which is not only to cleanse, but to seal the inner
from the outer. Once more we can see the distinction between
sickness and health. As with animals each of which has its own
daily pattern of grooming, the wudu is a norm of human
grooming, and its neglect is a sign of sickness.
The
essence of the salaat is contained in the intention to perform
it. It is on that we are judged. In facing Makkah we recognize
our three dimensional existence, uniting in circles radiating
outwards from the Kaabah like ripples from
a stone thrown in a pond. We begin with a declaration
of God’s greatness, and we close with a declaration of peace
and mercy towards mankind.
The
salaat is built up from a simple form, called a rakat, which
is repeated a different number of times in the different
prayers. There are libraries of books written about it, but
I’ll give you the basics. For those who cannot speak the
words, the salaat is contained in its actions. Standing in a
position of service, a servant working for your Lord. Bowing
in a position of humility, offering your neck to His sword.
And prostrating in a position of complete self-effacement, no
more than the dust beneath His feet. One is also permitted to
sit at rest for a witnessing. La ilaha illa Allah.
The
words of the salaat are drawn from the Qur’an. One short
chapter, the Opening, is repeated in every rakat. After eleven
years it can still surprise me, and I am certain that it can
be studied for a lifetime.
In
the name of God, All Merciful, All Compassionate.
All praise belongs to God, the Lord of the Worlds,
All Merciful, All Compassionate,
Master of the Day of Judgement.
You alone we serve, and You alone we ask for help,
Show us the straight way,
The way of those with blessings upon them,
Not those with anger upon them,
Nor
those who stray. (1.1-7)
Along
with the Surah of the Opening is appended as much or as little
of the rest of the Qur’an as one wishes. And there you have
the prayer. Easy, yet nine out of ten of the people who call
themselves muslims don’t bother. For some reason they think
other things are more important.
Say:
"My Lord esteems you not at all were it not for your
prayer." (25.77)
As
you can see, the prayer and the Qur’an are inextricably
linked. Without the Qur’an there is no prayer, and the
prayer is the repository and protection of the Qur’an. So
what is this thing we call the Qur’an Well I promise you it
is something else! I’ve read some books in my time, but see
that Koran – magic. Of course it has been massacred in
translation, and disembowelled by academics eager to expose it
as a fraud. That pomposity and arrogance leaps up off the
commentators’ pages and hits one between the eyes again.
Because they are incapable of seeing anything in it which fits
their ideas of how a book ought to be written, they would have
you believe that it was flung together by a bunch of idiots
with no better idea as to how to collate it than that they
should put the longest bits first and the shortest bits last,
and the half-wits couldn’t even get that right. Even the
best and most sincere of translations can only be a pale
shadow. This is the one I use. Me and just about every English
speaking muslim I know. A.J.Arberry OUP – I recommend it.
Another
recommendation. Don’t treat it like a novel, starting at the
beginning and working through. Dip into it and let it take you
where it will. Read it from the inside our, it works better
that way.
With
the truth We have sent it down, and with the truth it has come
down; and We have
sent thee not, except good tidings to bear, and warning;
and
a Koran We have divided, for thee to recite it to mankind at
intervals, and We have sent it down successively.
Say:
"Believe in it, or believe not; those who were given the
knowledge before it when it is recited to them, fall down upon
their faces prostrating,
and
say, "Glory be to our Lord! Our Lord's promise is
performed." (17.105-108)
The
Qur’an. It means a Recitation, a spoken reading. But a
reading of what? The Book. What Book? Is this not the Book?
Well obviously if this is the Reading. So what Book? Let’s
see if we can hazard a guess. This is a book in my hand. We
all know that. I am reading from it. However, I wonder what
someone out of the New Guinea jungle might make of it, or even
one of those little pygmies some of you probably keep in the
playpen at home. Can you eat this thing? It doesn’t smell of
much. Perhaps it could be worn as a hat. To them it’s not a
book, it’s just some woody leaf like sort of stuff with odd
marks on. Your learn it is a book, then you learn how to read
it. But the Qur’an talks of a different kind of Book. A Book
in which you can have no doubt? Can you think of anything in
which you have no doubt? Well you don’t doubt that you’re
here do you? You see, this also is a book if only you could
read it. A different book for each person. I’m not seeing
the same thing as you, and he’s seeing something completely
different. The Prophets were taught to read their Books, and
each was in sometimes miraculous harmony with his Book, and
understood what it said. And that way a few men could defeat
an army, a boy could slay a giant, a slave child could triumph
over Pharaoh.
Come
on – You mean we’re supposed to think of this as a book?
Where do you get that idea?
Didst
thou not know that God knows all that is in heaven and earth?
Surely that is in a Book; surely that for God is an easy
matter. (22.70)
No
female bears or brings forth, save with His knowledge; and
none is given long life who is given long life
neither is any diminished in his life, but it is in a
Book. Surely that is easy for God. (35.11)
And
We have sent down to thee the Book with the truth, confirming
the Book that was before it, and assuring it. (5.51)
Every
term has a Book. God blots out, and He establishes whatsoever
He will; and with Him is the Essence of the Book. (13.38-39)
And
We have sent down on thee the Book making clear everything,
and as a guidance and a mercy, and as good tidings to those
who surrender. (16.89)
This
Koran could not have been forged apart from God; but it is a
confirmation of what is before it, and a distinguishing of the
Book, wherein is no doubt, from the Lord of all Being. (10.37)
A
Book whose signs have been distinguished as an Arabic Koran
for a people having knowledge (41.3)
What
signs? Some prophets had clear signs, miracles.
And
Moses came to you with the clear signs (2.92)
And
when Jesus came with the clear signs he said, "I have
come to you with wisdom, and that I may make clear to you some
of that whereon you are at variance; so fear you God and obey
you me. Assuredly God is my Lord and your Lord; therefore
serve Him; this is a straight path." (43.63-64)
The
rest of us just have the day to day miracles to go on.
We
shall show them Our signs in the horizons and in themselves,
till it is clear to them that it is the truth. Suffices it not
as to thy Lord, that He is witness over everything? Are they
not in doubt touching the encounter with their Lord? Does He
not encompass everything? (41.53-54)
And
of His signs is that He created you of dust; then lo, you are
mortals, all scattered abroad.
And
of His signs is that He created for you, of yourselves,
spouses, that you might repose in them, and He has set between
you love and mercy. Surely in that are signs for a people who
consider.
And
of His signs is the creation of the heavens and earth and the
variety of your tongues and hues. Surely in that are signs for
all living beings.
And
of His signs is your slumbering by night and day, and your
seeking after His bounty. Surely in that are signs for a
people who hear.
And
of His signs He shows you lightning, for fear and hope, and
that He sends down out of heaven water and He revives the
earth after it is dead. Surely in that are signs for a people
who understand.
And
of His signs is that the heaven and earth stand firm by His
command; then, when He calls you once and suddenly, out of the
earth, lo you shall come forth. (30.20-25)
And
of His signs is that thou seest the earth humble; then, when
We send down water upon it, it quivers, and swells. Surely He
who quickens it is He who quickens the dead; surely He is
powerful over everything. (41.39)
See,
I told you – magic.
And
when was this Qur’an first revealed to the prophet? Ramadhan
– third pillar
For
one month each year, changing as the moon changes, muslims go
without food, drink, sex and smoking between the dawn and
sunset. In the way that our day is structured by the prayer,
so our years are punctuated by the rhythmic reoccurrence of
Ramadhan. Looking back over the years, I can remember a number
of occasions when what happened in my prayers seemed
extraordinary, a revelation. Mostly it feels more practical
than inspired, but the month of fasting invariably has an
intensity that gives each year a fierce individuality, often
laced with the most eccentric of occurrences. Thus looking
back it is possible to see the line of one’s life pegged on
the peaks of successive Ramadhans. It is indeed a wondrous
month. It is also the time for the gathering of a part of the
Zakat, the alms tax.
Next
pillar. From the earliest days of Islam, the surahs of the
Qur’an were divided into two, the Makkan surahs and the
Madinan surahs. Makkah and Madina reflect the two aspects of
mankind, the inner and the outer, the personal and the social.
There are things that a man has to do for his own well-being,
and there are things that a group of men have to do for the
welfare of the social unit. In the prayer a man helps the
group by looking after his own welfare, and by paying the alms
tax he helps himself by looking after the well-being of the
group. In the formalisation of a tax on all accumulated wealth
for redistribution to the needy, we see the Realpolitik of
Islam. It’s not all prayer and philosophy, it’s social
security. We are shown what is essential to the group as well
as the man. Then in the final pillar we see the man stripped
of all but a winding sheet, one drop in the ocean of his
global society, annihilated in Arafah.
Hajj,
the pilgrimage. The focal point of a lifetime. And what is
required of a man when he reaches this peak of his spiritual
life? It is said that the whole of the Qur’an is contained
in the Bismillah, and the whole of the Bismillah is contained
in the dot of the Ba. At the focal point of his existence, at
the peak of the Hajj on the plain of Arafah, a man is required
to do nothing. He stands, in silence, alone, amongst the
believers.
And
who are the believers?
The
servants of the All-merciful are those who walk in the earth
modestly and who, when the ignorant address them, say,
"Peace" (25.63)
True
piety is this: to believe in God, and the Last Day, the
angels, the Book, and the Prophets, to give of one's
substance, however cherished, to kinsmen and orphans, the
needy, the traveller, beggars, and to ransom the slave, to
perform the prayer, to pay the alms. And they who fulfil their
covenant
when they have engaged in a covenant, and endure with
fortitude misfortune, hardship and peril, these are they who
are true in their faith, these are the truly godfearing.
(2.177)
Well,
here we are on the final page, and we just about made it. It
is a pity I spent so long talking about the approach that
there was hardly any time left to talk about the Islam, but
there you go.
Though
all the trees in the earth were pens, and the sea - seven seas
after it to replenish it, yet would the Words of God not be
spent. God is All-mighty, All-wise. (31.27)
Anyway,
before we go, I would like to apologise to the ladies for the
masculinity of the language, all those “man”s and
“he”s and “him”s require a little more mental effort
on your part, but your were not meant to be excluded.
And
I would like to give the final reminder to all of you. We are
living just a few miles from the largest stockpile of nuclear
weapons in Europe. It only takes one cack-handed corporal to
spill his coffee in the computer. Are you ready?
And
when heaven is split asunder, and turns crimson like red
leather - O which of your Lord's bounties will you and you
deny? (55.37-38)
And
death's agony comes in truth; that is what thou wast shunning!
(50.19)
And
the matter of the Hour is as a twinkling of the eye, or
nearer. Surely God is powerful over everything. (16.77)
But
I also have some good news.
What
is with you comes to an end, but what is with God abides; and
surely We shall recompense those who were patient their wage,
according to the best of what they did. And whosoever does a
righteous deed, be it male or female, believing, We shall
assuredly give him to live a goodly life; and We shall
recompense them their wage, according to the best of what they
did. (16.96-97)
Ya
Allah. Forgive me if I have strayed from the truth, or stained
the memory of your prophet Muhammad. Astaghfirallah.
Well,
I’ve already quoted about sixty-odd passages from the
Qur’an, but to close the show I thought I’d read one more.
If
We had sent down this Koran upon a mountain, thou wouldst have
seen it humbled, split asunder out of the fear of God. And
those similitudes - We strike them for men; haply they will
reflect.
He
is God; there is no god but He. He is the knower of the Unseen
and the Visible; He is the All-merciful, the
All-compassionate.
He
is God; there is no god but He. He is the King, the All-holy,
the All-peacable, the All-faithful, the All-preserver, the
All-mighty, the All-compeller, the All-sublime. Glory be to
God, above that they associate!
He
is God, the Creator, the Maker, the Shaper. To Him belong the
Names Most Beautiful. All that is in the heavens and the earth
magnifies Him; He is the All-mighty, the All-wise. (59.21-24)
|